Indonesian Journal of Education Methods Development
Vol. 18 No. 1 (2023): February
Elementary Education Method

Question Level Analysis based on the Observed Taxonomy of Learning Outcome Structures in the 2013 Elementary School Mathematics Curriculum Book
Analisis Level Pertanyaan berdasarkan Taksonomi Struktur Hasil Belajar yang Diamati pada Buku Matematika Kurikulum 2013 Sekolah Dasar


View Article Suplementary File
Similarity Check Result
  • Luluk Muflikhatul Uyun,
  • Mahardika Darmawan Kusuma Wardana*
Luluk Muflikhatul Uyun
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Mahardika Darmawan Kusuma Wardana
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia *

(*) Corresponding Author
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/ijemd.v21i.718
Published February 27, 2023
Keywords
  • Questions,
  • SOLO Taxonomy,
  • 2013 Curriculum Mathematics Book
How to Cite
Uyun, L. M., & Wardana, M. D. K. (2023). Question Level Analysis based on the Observed Taxonomy of Learning Outcome Structures in the 2013 Elementary School Mathematics Curriculum Book: Analisis Level Pertanyaan berdasarkan Taksonomi Struktur Hasil Belajar yang Diamati pada Buku Matematika Kurikulum 2013 Sekolah Dasar. Indonesian Journal of Education Methods Development, 18(1), 10.21070/ijemd.v21i.718. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijemd.v21i.718

Copyright (c) 2023 Luluk Muflikhatul Uyun, Mahardika Darmawan Kusuma Wardana

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This study aims to describe the level of questions on math story problems in the 2013 curriculum book by calculating the percentage of each level of Unistructural, Multistructural, Relational, and Expanded Abstract. This study uses a qualitative approach with a check list method. The SOLO taxonomy is an evaluation tool to determine the quality of the response to a problem. The results of this study contained 230 questions overall and 32 questions SOLO Taxonomy. Unistructural question level percentage 6.24% SOLO Taxonomy questions. The percentage at the level of Multistructural questions is 3.24%, while at the level of relational questions is 90.62%, and the percentage at Expanded Abstract is 0%. From the results of the data obtained, it appears that at the level of the Relational question has the highest percentage with a result of 90.62%. This shows that the 2013 curriculum fifth grade mathematics book is in accordance with the theory of SOLO Taxonomy.

View Article Suplementary File
Similarity Check Result

References

  1. S. D. Putranti and R. C. I. Prahmana, “Kemampuan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Berbasis Masalah,” JNPM (Jurnal Nas. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 86, 2018, doi: 10.33603/jnpm.v2i1.943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v2i1.943
  2. R. Amelia and Oktapiyanti, “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Smk Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Materi Persamaan Lingkaran Berdasarkan Taksonomi Solo Plus Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Matematika Dasar,” J. Pembelajaran Mat. Inov., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 35–48, 2020, doi: 10.22460/jpmi.v3i1.p35-48.
  3. R. Lusiana, “Analisis kesalahan mahasiswa dalam memecahkan masalah pada materi himpunan ditinjau dari gaya kognitif,” J. Penelit. dan pembelajaran Mat., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 24–29, 2017, doi: 10.30870/jppm.v10i1.1290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v10i1.1290
  4. A. Fitri, N. Kurniawati, and Z. Mubaroh, “Respon Peserta Didik dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Taksonomi SOLO (Structure of Observed Learning Outcome),” … J. Mat. dan …, vol. 4, no. September, pp. 153–159, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://ejurnal.unim.ac.id/index.php/majamath/article/view/1099
  5. Y. Nurmalasari and R. Erdiantoro, “Perencanaan Dan Keputusan Karier: Konsep Krusial Dalam Layanan BK Karier,” Quanta, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 44–51, 2020, doi: 10.22460/q.v1i1p1-10.497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22460/q.v1i1p1-10.497
  6. E. Sutriani and R. Octaviani, “Analisis Data Dan Pengecekan Keabsahan Data,” INA-Rxiv, pp. 1–22, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/3w6qs
  7. J. B. BIGGS and K. F. COLLIS, “Origin and description of the SOLO taxonomy,” Eval. Qual. Learn., vol. 1, pp. 17–31, 1982, doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-097552-5.50007-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-097552-5.50007-7
  8. L. F. Claudia, T. A. Kusmayadi, and L. Fitriana, “The SOLO taxonomy: classify students’ responses in solving linear program problems,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1538, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1538/1/012107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1538/1/012107
  9. B. A. Siagian, “Analisis Level Pertanyaan Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia Siswa Kelas X Kurikulum 2013 Berbasis Taksonomi Solo (Structure of Observed Learning Outcome),” Basastra, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 310–318, 2018, doi: 10.24114/bss.v7i4.11813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/bss.v7i4.11813
  10. M. I. Onie Nasmi Fathani, Sunardi, “Analisis Level Pertanyaan Pada Soal Cerita Matematika dalam Buku Erlangga Straight Point Series Kelas V SD Berdasarkan Taksonomi SOLO,” vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 68–74, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/jipsd.v8i1.24570
  11. I. Suciati, “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Kelas V Sdn Pengawu Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Pada Operasi Hitung Pecahan,” Indiktika J. Inov. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 121, 2019, doi: 10.31851/indiktika.v1i2.3033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31851/indiktika.v1i2.3033