Metacognitive Processes in Elementary Students’ Drawings
Proses Metakognitif dalam Gambar Siswa Sekolah Dasar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21070/ijemd.v20i4.949Keywords:
Metacognition, Elementary School, Drawing, Problem-Solving, Self-RegulationAbstract
General background: Metacognition, defined as thinking about thinking, plays an essential role in guiding students to plan, monitor, and evaluate their own learning processes. Specific background: In elementary education, students often struggle to control their learning strategies, particularly when faced with problem-solving tasks. Knowledge gap: Limited research has examined how young learners demonstrate metacognitive processes through creative outputs such as drawings. Aims: This study aimed to analyze how elementary school students apply metacognitive strategies when completing drawing tasks. Results: Two students were given three tasks with different themes—ideals, guided lines, and animals. Both students employed the stages of planning, monitoring, and evaluating, although with variations in depth according to their individual abilities. The drawings revealed how metacognitive processes shaped problem-solving approaches. Novelty: The study highlights the role of drawings as a medium to observe and understand students’ metacognitive processes. Implications: The findings suggest that incorporating metacognitive strategies in elementary education can support self-regulation, creativity, and more effective problem-solving.
Highlights:
-
Drawings reveal students’ metacognitive processes clearly.
-
Planning, monitoring, and evaluating vary across individuals.
-
Drawing tasks serve as effective tools for studying cognition.
Keywords: Metacognition; Elementary School; Drawing; Problem-Solving; Self-Regulation
References
[1] K. S. Adnyana and G. N. A. Yudaparmita, “Peningkatan Minat Belajar IPAS Berbantuan Media Gambar pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar,” Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 61, 2023, doi: 10.55115/edukasi.v4i1.3023.
[2] W. Widiana, “Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Metakognitif di Sekolah Dasar: Kajian Berpikir tentang Berpikir,” Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, vol. 8, pp. 1–68, 2022.
[3] P. F. A. Z. Faridahtul Jannah and T. I. Fathuddin, “Problematika Penerapan Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar 2022,” Al Yazidiy: Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Pendidikan, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 55–65, 2022.
[4] A. Albalhareth and A. Alasmari, “Metacognitive Strategies Implemented with d/Dhh Students in Upper Elementary Schools in Saudi Arabia,” Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 47, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101222.
[5] S. U. Khasana and Darsinah, “Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Flobamorata,” Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Flobamorata, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022.
[6] T. L. Wati, “Analisis Metakognitif melalui Media pada Mata Kuliah Seni Rupa Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar,” Pedagogia: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 35–42, 2020, doi: 10.21070/pedagogia.v9i1.214.
[7] M. F. Amir and M. D. Kusuma W., “Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Kontekstual untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Metakognisi Siswa Sekolah Dasar,” Jurnal Medives: Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 117, 2018, doi: 10.31331/medives.v2i1.538.
[8] A. Patmaningrum, “Pemanfaatan Kemampuan Metakognitif dalam Upaya Peningkatan Proses Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matematika,” Jurnal Dharma Pendidikan STKIP PGRI Nganjuk, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 15–21, 2021.
[9] E. A. Febrianti, “Desain Instrumen Tes untuk Mengukur Metakognisi Peserta Didik pada Materi Asam Basa,” Universitas Negeri Semarang Repository, 2020.
[10] E. Purwaningsih, “Urgensi Kebutuhan Pembelajaran Ekonomi Berkarakter Berbasis Kelas di SMA,” Jurnal Visi Ilmu Pendidikan, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 74, 2022, doi: 10.26418/jvip.v14i1.43383.
[11] T. L. Wati and D. Novita, “Analisis Gambar Siswa Tuna Rungu Ditinjau dari Makna Bahasa Rupa (Bentuk dan Warna) di SLB Dewi Sartika Geluran Sidoarjo,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and Cultural Research Studies (ICECRS), vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1–12, 2018, doi: 10.21070/picecrs.v1i3.1400.
[12] H. Setiyawan, “Pemanfaatan Media Audio Visual dan Media Gambar pada Siswa Kelas V,” Jurnal Prakarsa Paedagogia, vol. 3, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.24176/jpp.v3i2.5874.
[13] H. Islamuddin, Psikologi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Pustaka Pelajar, STAIN Jember Press, 2012.
[14] M. N. Fazria and T. L. Wati, “Analisis Kreativitas Menggambar Imajinasi Peserta Didik Kelas IV Ditinjau dari Aspek (Kemampuan Tinggi, Sedang, Rendah) di SDN,” ELSE (Elementary School Education Journal): Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 331–350, 2022.
[15] A. Nasir, N. Nurjana, K. Shah, R. A. Sirodj, and M. W. Afgani, “Pendekatan Fenomenologi dalam Penelitian Kualitatif,” Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 4445–4451, 2023.
[16] R. Junaidi and F. Susanti, “Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Budaya Organisasi terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada UPTD Baltekkomdik Dinas Pendidikan Provinsi Sumatera Barat,” Jurnal Manajemen dan Informasi, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 13, 2019.
[17] A. Alfansyur and Mariyani, “Seni Mengelola Data: Penerapan Triangulasi Teknik, Sumber, dan Waktu pada Penelitian Pendidikan Sosial,” Historis, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 146–150, 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Imelda Selly Yuliasanti, TRI LINGGO WATI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
