Vol. 12 (2020): November
Elementary Education Method

An Error Analysis Student’s Writing Descriptive Text At Junior High School
Analisis Kesalahan Penulisan Teks Deskriptif Siswa Di Sekolah Menengah Pertama


Virny Melisa Irwandi
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Dian Rachma Santoso
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia *

(*) Corresponding Author
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published November 23, 2020
Keywords
  • Error,
  • Error Analysis,
  • Writing,
  • Descriptive Text
How to Cite
Irwandi, V. M., & Santoso, D. R. (2020). An Error Analysis Student’s Writing Descriptive Text At Junior High School: Analisis Kesalahan Penulisan Teks Deskriptif Siswa Di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Indonesian Journal of Education Methods Development, 12, 10.21070/ijemd.v12i.559. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijemd.v12i.559

Abstract

Error analysis is one of method to help the teacher in teaching and learning languange ,  not only in English but in other languagesince the teacher will observe the reason or context why the mistakes are made by the students especially in writing. This error happened when the learners cannot correct themselves.Based on the  experience of the writer, not every student at SMP PGRI 10 Candi write the text correctly, because some student in SMP PGRI 10 Candi translate Bahasa to English directly. This is mean that students are influenced by Bahasa patterns in writing. So, the writer wants to help the students at SMP PGRI 10 Candi write descriptive text better and appropriate with the generic structure. The aim of this study is to find out the types of error analysis by Dulay Theory and the dominant type of Surface Strategy Taxonomy in descriptive text that the student wrote. The types of error based on Surface Strategy Taxonomy are (1) Omission (2) Addition (3) Misformation (4) Misordeing. This study used qualitative research through content analysis method. This data was classified based on several criteria. From this study the researcher conlcluded that the dominant types of errors analysis is in misformation

References

  1. Dulay, Burt and Krashen. 1982. Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press
  2. Brown, H. Douglas. 2001. Language Assessment Principle and Classroom Practice. New York: Longman.
  3. Harmer, Jeremy. 2004. How to Teach Writing. New York: Longman.
  4. Meyers, Alan. 2005. Gateways to Academic Writing: Effective Sentences, Paragraphs, and Essays. New York: Pearson Education, Inc
  5. Hedge, T. 2005. Writing –Resources Books for Teachers. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  6. Boardman, Cynthia. A. 2002. Writing to Communicate (Paragraph and Essay).NewYork:Longman
  7. Axelrode, Rise B. and Charles R. Cooper. 2010. The ST. Martin‘s Guide to Writing Fifth Edition.New York: ST Martins Press
  8. Hammond, Jenny. 1992. English for Social Purposes. Sydney: Macquire University
  9. Robert, C. Bogdan, and Sari Knopp Biklen. 2006. Qualitative Research for Education. 5th Edition An Introduction to Theories and Methods. Boston: Pearson Education.
  10. Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif R & D. Bandung Alfabeta