Indonesian Journal of Education Methods Development
Vol. 9 (2020): February
Elementary Education Method

Modeling and Pedagogy


View Article
  • Sashka Jovanovska *
Sashka Jovanovska
PhD, English professor, North Macedonia, Macedonia, Republic of *

(*) Corresponding Author
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/ijemd.v9i1.543
Published February 24, 2020
Keywords
  • Modelling,
  • Learning,
  • Students,
  • Purpose
How to Cite
Jovanovska , S. (2020). Modeling and Pedagogy. Indonesian Journal of Education Methods Development, 9, 10.21070/ijemd.v9i1.543. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijemd.v9i1.543

Copyright (c) 2020 Sashka Jovanovska

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The depth of knowledge a student will develop while building a model, the memories and skills they will gain that transcend content, and the teamwork they will develop during the process are just a few of the benefits of the modeling process. Ultimately, the modeling process will allow students and teachers to experience education in a way that matches the way work is done in scientific research, engineering, and other professional settings. Having students build models to solve problems is an enormous goal and enormous goals require enormous planning. The purpose of this guide is to outline the pedagogical approaches a teacher will need to lead their students on the journey from novice modelers to expert modelers

View Article

References

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans . New York: Oxford University Press.
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993) Benchmarks for science literacy. Washington, DC: Author.
  3. Ackerson, V.L., F. Abd-El-Khalick, and N.G. Lederman. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers‘ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4) 295–317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200004)37:4<295::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-2
  4. Bell, P., Bricker, L., Tzou, C., Lee, T., & Van Horne, K. (2012). Exploring the science framework: Engaging learners in scientific practices related to obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information. Science Scope, 36(3), 17-22.
  5. Bell, R., Gess-Newsome, J., & Luft, J. (2008). Technology in the secondary science classroom. NSTA Press, Arlington, VA
  6. Lederman,N.G. (1992). Students‘ and teachers‘ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290404
  7. Lederman, N. G. (1998). The state of science education: Subject matter without context. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(2).
  8. Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. (2000). Symbolizing, communicating, and mathematizing: Key components of models and modeling. Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms. Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers , 361– 384.
  9. Prins, G. T., Bulte, A. M. W., & Pilot, A. (2011). Evaluation of a Design Principle for Fostering Students; Epistemological Views on Models and Modelling Using Authentic Practices as Context for Learning in Chemistry Education. International Journal of Science Education, 33(11), 1539-1569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.519405
  10. Prins, G. T., Bulte, A. M. W., Van Driel, J. H., & Pilot, A. (2008). Selection of Authentic Modelling Practices as Contexts for Chemistry Education. International Journal of Science Education. 30(14), 1867-1890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701581823