Vol. 6 (2019): May
Elementary Education Method

Students’Perceptions on Program Learning Outcomes: A Secondary Data Analysis of An Exit Survey



(*) Corresponding Author
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published May 20, 2019
Keywords
  • Outcome based education,
  • Program learning outcomes,
  • Malaysian Qualification Framework,
  • Conditional probability,
  • Pareto analysis
How to Cite
Nik Mohd Yusoff, N. N. (2019). Students’Perceptions on Program Learning Outcomes: A Secondary Data Analysis of An Exit Survey. Indonesian Journal of Education Methods Development, 6, 10.21070/ijemd.v5i1.47. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijemd.v5i1.47

Abstract

Outcome based education (OBE) emphasized on designing, constructing, delivering and documenting the teaching and learning to be in line with the established program learning outcomes (PLO) by the Malaysian Qualification Framework (MQF) to improve the quality of learning. The study focuses on students’ perceptions on the PLO at the School of Quantitative Sciences (SQS), Universiti Utara Malaysia.A secondary data from an exit survey among graduating students of SQS has been analysed for this purpose. Study finding shows that on average, all respondents perceived that they werefairly strongly to strongly for all PLOs. The information obtained from the exit survey data is able to rank the PLO by its corresponding mean value in decreasing order.The purpose of this study is to obtain information on the extent to which the students have mastered the skills (PLO) from their own view.This study has been done by secondary data collection. The secondary data was from a 2017 Exit Survey with 46 respondents among graduating students of SQS, UUM. All of these students were enrolled in Bachelor of Science with Honors (Business Mathematics) program.All respondents perceived that they were at fairly strong to strong level for all PLO. The information obtained from the exit survey data is able to rank the PLO by its corresponding mean value in decreasing order.This study will be beneficial to curriculum providers as a reference for improvement by understanding the needs and current states of the students. Moreover, this research will provide recommendations on how to evaluate program learning outcomes.

References

  1. Allen J., 1996. Learning outcomes in higher education. Studies in Higher Education,21(1), 93-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079612331381487
  2. Dodridge M., 1999. Learning outcomes and their assessment in higher education. Engineering Science andEducation Journal, 161-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/esej:19990405
  3. Harden R. M., 2007. Outcome-based education – the ostrich, peacock and the beaver. Medical Teacher,29, 666-671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701729948
  4. Lockhoff J., Wegejis B., Durkin K., Wagenaar R., González J., Dalla Rosa L. &Gobbi, M. (2011). A guide to formulating degree programme profiles. Including programme competences and programme learning outcomes. University ofDeusto.
  5. Sidek, R. S. M., Jamsari, E. A., Ahmad, M., Rozali, E. A., Arifin, Z., Nor, A. H. M., ... & Hussain, M. (2012).Student perception of program learning outcome: Case study at faculty of islamic studies, UniversitiKebangsaan Malaysia. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 8(7), 3241-3248.
  6. Malaysian Qualifications Framework, 2011.http://www.mqa.gov.my/portalMQA/dokumen/MALAYSIAN%20QUALIFICATIONS%20FRAMEWORK_2011.pdf
  7. Watson P., (2002). The role and integration of learning outcomes into the educational process. Active Learningin Higher Education,3(3), 205-219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787402003003002