Indonesian Journal of Education Methods Development
Vol. 5 (2019): February
Elementary Education Method

The composition of practice teaching in special education: A preliminary study


View Article
  • Shamsul Rizal Khalil*,
  • Abdul Rahim Razalli,
  • Mohd Faiz Mohd Yaakob
Shamsul Rizal Khalil
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia *
Abdul Rahim Razalli
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia
Mohd Faiz Mohd Yaakob
Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

(*) Corresponding Author
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/ijemd.v3i2.19
Published February 18, 2019
Keywords
  • Teaching Composition,
  • teaching practice,
  • Special Needs
How to Cite
Shamsul Rizal Khalil, Abdul Rahim Razalli, & Mohd Faiz Mohd Yaakob. (2019). The composition of practice teaching in special education: A preliminary study. Indonesian Journal of Education Methods Development, 5, 10.21070/ijemd.v3i2.19. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijemd.v3i2.19

Copyright (c) 2019 Shamsul Rizal Khalil, Abdul Rahim Razalli, Mohd Faiz Mohd Yaakob

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Teaching composition of the practice teaching among teachers is important. Indeed, strategic teaching is a way of making decisions about a course, an individual class, or even an entire curriculum, beginning with an analysis of key variables in the teaching situation. This study, a preliminary study about teaching composition among special education teachers. The strategic composition namely as Quality of Instruction; The Appropriate Level of Instruction, Incentive; Time; and Lesson Plans. The findings showed Quality of Instruction is the highest level and the lowest variable is Time. Discussions and recommendations are stated for authorities and academic contribution.

View Article

References

  1. Abrami, P.C., L. Leventhal, and R.P. Perry. 1982. Educational seduction. Review of Educational Research 52(3): 446-462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1170425
  2. Anderson, L.M., C. Evertson, and J. Brophy. 1979. An experimental study of effective teaching in first-grade reading-groups. Elementary School Journal 79(3): 193-223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/461151
  3. Atkinson, J.W., and D. Birch. 1978. Introduction to Motivation (2nd Edition). New York: Van Nostrand.
  4. Barr, R. 1992. Teachers, materials, and group composition in literacy instruction. In Elementary school literacy: Critical issues, ed. M.J. Dreher and W.H. Slater, 19-33. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon..
  5. Barth, R. 1979. Home-based reinforcement of school behavior: A review and analysis. Review of Educational Research 49(3): 436-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543049003436
  6. Brophy, J. 1987. Synthesis of research on strategies for motivating students to learn. Educational Leadership 5 (Oct.): 40-48.
  7. Brophy, J.E. and T.L. Good. 1986. Teacher behavior and student achievement. In Handbook of Research on Teaching, Third Edition, ed. M.C. Wittrock, 328-357. New York: MacMillan.
  8. Brophy, J.E. and T.L. Good. 1986. Teacher behavior and student achievement. In Handbook of Research on Teaching, Third Edition, ed. M.C. Wittrock, 328-357. New York: MacMillan.
  9. Brophy, J.E., and C.M. Everston. 1974. (Research Report No. 74-4). Austin: Research & Development Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas.
  10. Cohen L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2007) Research Methods in Education (6th edition) London: Routledge-Falmer DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053
  11. Cooley, W.W., and G. Leinhardt. 1980. The instructural dimensions study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 2(1): 7-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737002001007
  12. Dunkin, M. 1978. Student characteristics, classroom processes, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 70(6): 998-1009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0078163
  13. Emmer, E.T., and A. Aussiker. 1990. School and classroom discipline programs: How well do they work? In Student discipline strategies, ed. O.C. Moles, 111-136. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  14. Fah, L. Y., & Hoon, K. C. (2015).Pengenalan Kepada Pendekatan Kuantitatif Dalam Penyelidikan Pendidikan (Edisi ke-4). Penerbit Universiti Malaysia Sabah. Ahli Majlis Penerbitan IlmihMalaysia (MAPIM)
  15. Frederick, W., and H. Walberg. 1980. Learning as a function of time. Journal of Educational Research 73: 183-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1980.10885233
  16. Gold, R.M., A. Reilly, R. Silberman, and R. Lehr. 1971. Academic achievement declines under pass-fail grading. Journal of Experimental Education 39(1): 17-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1971.11011260
  17. Good, T. 1987. Teacher expectations. In Talks to Teachers, ed. D. Berliner and B. Rosenshine, 159-200. New York: Random House.
  18. Good, T., and S. Marshall. 1984. Do students learn more in heterogeneous or homogeneous groups? In The social context of instruction: Group organization and group processes, ed. P. Peterson, L.C. Wilkinson, and M. Hallinan, 15-38. New York: Academic Press.
  19. Hales, L.W., P.T. Bain, and L.P. Rand. 1971. An investigation of some aspects of the pass-fail grading system. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, February 17, New York..
  20. Hiebert, J., D. Wearne, and S. Taber. 1991. Fourth graders' gradual construction of decimal fractions during instruction using different physical representations. Elementary School Journal 91: 321-341.
  21. Hiebert, J., D. Wearne, and S. Taber. 1991. Fourth graders' gradual construction of decimal fractions during instruction using different physical representations. Elementary School Journal 91: 321-341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/461658
  22. How We Can Help You. (n.d.). Retrieved June 28, 2018, from https://tll.mit.edu/help/what-strategic-teaching.
  23. Kallison, J.M. 1986. Effects of lesson organization on achievement. American Educational Research Journal 23(2): 337-347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023002337
  24. Kaplan, R.M., and G.C. Pascoe. 1977. Humorous lectures and humorous examples: Some effects upon comprehension and retention. Journal of Educational Psychology 69(1): 61-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.69.1.61
  25. Karweit, N.L. 1989. Time and learning: A review. In School and Classroom Organization, ed. R.E. Slavin, 69-95. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  26. Karweit, N.L. 1989. Time and learning: A review. In School and Classroom Organization, ed. R.E. Slavin, 69-95. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203056950-3
  27. Kozma, R. 1991. Learning with media. Review of Educational Research 61(2): 179-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061002179
  28. Land, M.L. 1987. Vagueness and clarity. In International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education, ed. M.J. Dunkin. New York: Pergamon.
  29. Leighton, M.S., and R.E Slavin. 1988. Achievement effects of instructional pace and systematic instruction in elementary mathematics. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Educational Research Association, March, New Orleans.
  30. Leinhardt, G., and A. Pallay. 1982. Restrictive educational settings: Exile or haven? Review of Educational Research 52: 557-578. Teacher of Mathematics, Chicago. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543052004557
  31. Leinhardt, G., and W. Bickel. 1987. Instruction's the thing wherein to catch the mind that falls behind. Educational Psychologist 22: 177-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2202_5
  32. Madden, N.A., and R.E. Slavin. 1983. Mainstreaming students with mild academic handicaps: Academic and social outcomes. Review of Educational Research 84: 131-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1170220
  33. Maddox, H., and E. Hoole. 1975. Performance decrement in the lecture. Educational Review 28: 17-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191750280102
  34. Malone, T., and M. Lepper. 1988. Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivation for learning. In Aptitude Learning and Instruction, Vol. III: Cognitive and Affective Process Analysis, ed. R. Snow and M. Farr, 70-81. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  35. Mayer, R.E., and J.K. Gallini. 1990. When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 715-726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.715
  36. Melton, R.F. 1978. Resolution of conflicting claims concerning the effect of behavioral objectives on student learning. Review of Educational Research 48: 291-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543048002291
  37. Mok Soon Sang(2002). Psikologi Pendidikan untuk Kursus Diploma Perguruan Semester 3. Subang Jaya: Kumpulan Budiman.
  38. Mok Soon Sang, ( 2009). Murid dan Alam Belajar. Ipoh: CIPTA Printing & Publishing (M) Sdn Bhd
  39. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  40. Oakes, J. 1985. Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Oakes, J. 1987. Tracking in secondary schools: A contextual perspective. Educational Psychologist 22: 129-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2202_3
  41. Pressley, M., E. Wood, V.E. Woloshyn, V Martin, A, King, and D. Menke. 1992. Encouraging mindful use of prior knowledge: Attempting to construct explanatory answers facilitates learning. Educational Psychologist 27: 91-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2701_7
  42. Rowan, B., and A. Miracle. 1983. Systems of ability grouping and the stratification of achievement in elementary schools. Sociology of Education 56: 133-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2112382
  43. Rowe, M.B. 1974. Wait-time and rewards as instructional variables, their influence on language, logic, and fate control. Part one: wait-time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 11: 81-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660110202
  44. Slavin, R.E. 1977. A new model of classroom motivation. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Educational Research Association, April, New York.
  45. Slavin, R.E. 1986. The Napa evaluation of Madeline Hunter's ITIP: Lessons learned. Elementary School Journal 87: 165-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/461486
  46. Slavin, R.E. 1987. Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research 57: 347-350.
  47. Slavin, R.E. 1987b. Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A bestevidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research 57: 347-350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543057003347
  48. Slavin, R.E. 1990. Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research 60(3): 471-499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060003471
  49. Slavin, R.E. 1994. Educational psychology: Theory into practice (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  50. Smith, L.R., and M.L. Cotton. 1980. Effect of lesson vagueness and discontinuity on student achievement and attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology 72: 670-675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.72.5.670
  51. Stallings, J., and E.M. Krasavage. 1986. Program implementation and student achievement in a four-year Madeline Hunter Follow Through Project. Elementary School Journal 87: 117- 138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/461483
  52. Stipek, D.J. 1993. Motivation to learn: From theory to practice (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.