Learning Cycle 5E Model and Junior High School Students’ Scientific Literacy
Model Siklus Pembelajaran 5E dan Literasi Ilmiah Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21070/ijemd.v20i4.916Keywords:
Learning Cycle 5E, Scientific Literacy, PCAP Indicators, Junior High School, Science EducationAbstract
General Background: Scientific literacy is a crucial 21st-century skill that enables students to apply scientific knowledge in solving real-life problems. Specific Background: In Indonesia, the results of PISA consistently show low levels of scientific literacy among students, highlighting the need for effective instructional models. Knowledge Gap: Previous studies have explored the Learning Cycle 5E model but rarely examined its role in addressing scientific literacy using the Pan-Canadian Assessment Program (PCAP) indicators. Aim: This study aimed to investigate the Learning Cycle 5E model in improving scientific literacy among junior high school students. Results: Using a quantitative pre-experimental design with a one-group pretest-posttest, findings revealed an N-gain of 0.6 (moderate category) and no significant differences across classes based on ANOVA (p = 0.126). Analysis of indicators showed improvements with scientific inquiry (70%, good), problem-solving (56%, fairly good), and scientific reasoning (43%, fairly good). Novelty: The study highlights the integration of PCAP indicators into the Learning Cycle 5E framework, providing a structured evaluation of scientific literacy beyond content mastery. Implications: These findings suggest that the 5E model supports active and inquiry-based learning, which can be adapted by teachers to foster better scientific literacy outcomes in junior high schools.
Highlights :
-
Structured evaluation of scientific literacy using PCAP indicators
-
Improvement in scientific inquiry, problem solving, and reasoning
-
Practical guidance for teachers in junior high school science
Keywords: Learning Cycle 5E, Scientific Literacy, PCAP Indicators, Junior High School, Science Education
References
[1] M. Nofiana, “Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa SMP di Kota Purwokerto Ditinjau dari Aspek Konten, Proses, dan Konteks Sains,” JSSH (Jurnal Sains Sosial dan Humaniora), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 77–84, 2017, doi: 10.30595/jssh.v1i2.1682.
[2] Z. A. Zulanwari, A. Ramdani, and S. Bahri, “Research Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa SMA Terhadap Soal-Soal PISA Pada Materi Virus dan Bakteri,” Journal of Classroom Action Research, vol. 5, pp. 210–216, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://jppipa.unram.ac.id/index.php/jcar/index
[3] A. Imran, R. Amini, and Y. Fitria, “Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Model Learning Cycle 5E di Sekolah Dasar,” Jurnal Basicedu, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 343–349, 2020, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v5i1.691.
[4] R. Safirah, F. Rachmadiarti, and M. Ibrahim, “Validitas Perangkat Pembelajaran Daring IPA Berbasis Model Inkuiri Terbimbing untuk Melatihkan Literasi Sains Siswa SMP,” Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengembangan, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 341–346, 2022.
[5] Y. Fitria, N. A. Alwi, and Chandra, Model Pembelajaran Literasi Sains. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2021.
[6] N. Nasrun, O. Jumadi, and M. Pallenari, “Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik pada Pembelajaran Biologi di SMA Negeri se-Kecamatan Biringkanaya Kota Makassar,” Proceedings of the Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, pp. 620–628, 2023.
[7] H. Fuadi, A. Z. Robbia, J. Jamaluddin, and A. W. Jufri, “Analisis Faktor Penyebab Rendahnya Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik,” Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 108–116, 2020, doi: 10.29303/jipp.v5i2.122.
[8] I. M. Salma, S. A. Hariani, and P. Pujiastuti, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle (5E) Berbasis STEM terhadap Literasi Sains dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X,” Dwija Cendekia: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 197–206, 2022, doi: 10.20961/jdc.v6i2.61600.
[9] OECD, PISA 2022 Results. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2022.
[10] M. D. Putri, “Identifikasi Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa di SMP Negeri 2 Pematang Tiga Bengkulu Tengah,” Gravitasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Sains, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 9–17, 2021, doi: 10.33059/gravitasi.jpfs.v4i01.3610.
[11] R. M. M. W. Putri, “Penerapan Pembelajaran Model Guided Discovery untuk Melatihkan Literasi Sains,” Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 249–254, 2017.
[12] A. Safrulloh and D. Desmayanasari, “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa SMP,” Edu-Mat Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 86–95, 2023, doi: 10.20527/edumat.v11i1.14940.
[13] N. G. Rohmah, S. M. Leksono, and A. Nestiadi, “Analisis Buku Teks IPA SMP Kelas VII Berdasarkan Muatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif pada Tema Udaraku Bersih,” Pendipa Journal of Science Education, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 353–360, 2022, doi: 10.33369/pendipa.6.2.353-360.
[14] Suparmi, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran IPA Kelas VIII.2 SMPN 25 Pekanbaru,” JOM FKIP, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2019.
[15] D. D. Fatmawati, N. Shofiyah, and P. Studi, “Penerapan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Berbasis Science Technology Engineering Mathematics dengan Model Problem Based Learning Sebagai Alternatif,” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA, 2016.
[16] N. Subekti and A. Fibonacci, “Model Pembelajaran Kimia Berbasis Etnosains (MPKBE) untuk Mengembangkan Literasi Sains Siswa,” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Kimia, pp. 83–90, 2014.
[17] A. Amalia, M. Rahayuningsih, and K. K. Pukan, “Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Pembelajaran Model Learning Cycle 5E Materi Ekosistem di SMA N 4 Pekalongan,” Bioma Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 234–247, 2019, doi: 10.26877/bioma.v8i1.4681.
[18] I. Zulchaidar, “Penerapan Model Learning Cycle 5E untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Siswa SMP dalam Pembelajaran IPA,” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 137–144, 2017.
[19] A. I. Rusydi, H. Hikmawati, and K. Kosim, “Pengaruh Model Learning Cycle 7E terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik,” Jurnal Pijar Mipa, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 124–131, 2018, doi: 10.29303/jpm.v13i2.741.
[20] D. N. Adilah and R. Budiharti, “Model Learning Cycle 7E dalam Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu,” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika dan Pendidikan Fisika ke-6, vol. 6, pp. 212–217, 2015.
[21] F. Nurhayati, “Efektivitas Pembelajaran dengan Metode Drill and Practice dan Learning Cycle 5E Disertai Media Crossword Puzzle terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa pada Materi Pokok Hidrokarbon Kelas X Semester Genap SMA Negeri Kebakkramat Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013,” Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2013.
[22] D. Nugraheni, S. Suyanto, and T. Harjana, “Pengaruh Siklus Belajar 5E terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Sains pada Materi Sistem Saraf Manusia,” Jurnal Prodi Pendidikan Biologi, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 178–188, 2017.
[23] A. L. Mazidah, Suliyanah, and Martini, “Model Learning Cycle 5E dengan Strategi Question Student Have,” Pensa Journal of Education and Teaching, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2012.
[24] A. A. Cahyani, F. N. Pertiwi, A. W. Rokmana, and I. A. Muna, “Efektivitas Model Learning Cycle 5E Berbasis Literasi Sains terhadap Kemampuan Bertanya Peserta Didik,” Jurnal Tadris IPA Indonesia, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 249–258, 2021, doi: 10.21154/jtii.v1i2.184.
[25] W. Widana and P. L. Muliani, Uji Persyaratan Analisis. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2020.
[26] L. Maghfiroh and N. Shofiyah, “Exploring the Influence of the Evidence-Based Reasoning Model in the Inquiry Approach to Enhancing Students’ Scientific Reasoning,” Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education (IJIS Edu), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 136–145, 2023, doi: 10.29300/ijisedu.v5i2.10737.
[27] D. Sukowati, A. Rusilowati, and Sugianto, “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains dan Metakognitif Peserta Didik,” Physics Communication, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 16–22, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/pc
[28] A. P. Irwan, “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Fisika di SMAN 2 Bulukumba,” Jurnal Sains dan Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 17–24, 2020, doi: 10.35580/jspf.v15i3.13494.
[29] N. Shofiyah, I. Afrilia, and F. E. Wulandari, “Scientific Approach and the Effect on Students’ Scientific Literacy,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1594, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1594/1/012015.
[30] A. Y. Anggraeni, W. Sri, and H. A. Nurul, “Profil Peningkatan Kemampuan Literasi Kimia Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbasis Kontekstual,” Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 2512–2523, 2020.
[31] N. Wulandari and H. Solihin, “Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) pada Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu untuk Meningkatkan Aspek Sikap Literasi Sains Siswa SMP,” in Proceedings of the Seminar Nasional Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Sains, 2015, pp. 437–440.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Noly Shofiyah, Faninda Larasati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
