Indonesian Journal of Education Methods Development
Vol. 5 (2019): February
Elementary Education Method

Cognitive autonomy differences among adolescents in Malaysia


View Article
  • Abderrahim Benlahcene*,
  • Sana Anwar Lashar,
  • Anita Lubana
Abderrahim Benlahcene
School of Education and modern Languages, Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM), Malaysia *
Sana Anwar Lashar
School of Education and modern Languages, Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM), Malaysia
Anita Lubana
Deparment of Botany, Government Girls College, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India

(*) Corresponding Author
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/ijemd.v3i2.14
Published February 18, 2019
Keywords
  • research,
  • Cognitive autonomy,
  • adolescents,
  • middle school
How to Cite
Abderrahim Benlahcene, Sana Anwar Lashar, & Anita Lubana. (2019). Cognitive autonomy differences among adolescents in Malaysia. Indonesian Journal of Education Methods Development, 5, 10.21070/ijemd.v3i2.14. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijemd.v3i2.14

Copyright (c) 2019 Abderrahim Benlahcene, Sana Anwar Lashar, Anita Lubana

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This research examined the relationship between five areas of cognitive autonomy and development among adolescents. Students from middle and high school in Keddah participated in this study. Ninety-four participants responded on the Cognitive Autonomy and Self-Evaluation (CASE) inventory, which examined the evaluative thinking, voicing opinions, comparative validation, decision making, and self-assessment.  Scores were compared based on gender and grade. Results highlighted that high school students scored significantly higher in two of the five areas of cognitive autonomy. Additionally, females in middle school rated themselves significantly higher in two areas of cognitive autonomy (evaluative thinking and decision making). Areas of academic grades, time watching TV, time spent reading, and using computer were also discussed.

View Article

References

  1. Allen, J. P., Hauser, S. T., O'CONNOR, T. G., & Bell, K. L. (2002). Prediction of peer-rated adult hostility from autonomy struggles in adolescent–family interactions. Development and Psychopathology, 14(01), 123-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579402001074
  2. Arnett, J. J. (1995). Adolescents' uses of media for self-socialization. Journal of youth and adolescence, 24(5), 519-533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537054
  3. Beckert, T. E. (2007). Cognitive autonomy and self-evaluation in adolescence: a conceptual investigation and instrument development. North American Journal of Psychology, 9(3), 579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t54411-000
  4. Beckert, T. E., Lee, C. T., & Vaterlaus, J. M. (2012). Cognitive Autonomy in Adolescence: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of American and Taiwanese High School Students. , (28), 7-45.
  5. Bednar, D. E., & Fisher, T. D. (2002). Peer referencing in adolescent decision making as a function of perceived parenting style. Adolescence, 38(152), 607-621.
  6. [Beyers, W., Goossens, L., Vansant, I., & Moors, E. (2003). A structural model of autonomy in middle and late adolescence: Connectedness, separation, detachment, and agency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32(5), 351-365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024922031510
  7. Caskey, M. M., & Ruben, B. (2003). Research for awakening adolescent learning. Education Digest, 69(4), 36-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.69.4
  8. Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (2002). A developmental psychopathology perspective on adolescence. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 70(1), 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.70.1.6
  9. Domenichelli, C. A. (2011). The Influence of Cognitive Autonomy and Learning Environments on Student Academic Performance: An investigation of the relationships between levels of cognitive autonomy, aspects of school learning environments and academic performance at the ninth-grade level.
  10. Dupuis, V. L., & Badiali, B. J. (1987). Classroom climate and teacher expectations in homogeneously grouped, secondary schools. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 28-33.
  11. Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society, 2nd. New York: WW.
  12. Finn, J. D., & Cox, D. (1992). Participation and withdrawal among fourth-grade pupils. American Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 141-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312029001141
  13. Greene, B. A., Miller, R. B., Crowson, H. M., Duke, B. L., & Akey, K. L. (2004). Predicting high school students' cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary educational psychology, 29(4), 462-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.006
  14. HERMAN‐GIDDENS, M. E. (2006). Recent data on pubertal milestones in United States children: the secular trend toward earlier development.International journal of andrology, 29(1), 241-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00575.x
  15. Kohler, P. D., & Field, S. (2003). Transition-Focused Education Foundation for the Future. The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 174-183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669030370030701
  16. Lampert, J. (2005). Easing the Transition to High School. Educational leadership, 62(7), 61-63.
  17. Manning, M. A. (2007). Self-concept and self-esteem in adolescents. Principal Leadership (Middle School Ed.), 7(6), 11-15.
  18. Meeus, W., Iedema, J., Maassen, G., & Engels, R. (2005). Separation–individuation revisited: On the interplay of parent–adolescent relations, identity and emotional adjustment in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 28(1), 89-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.07.003
  19. Miller, D. C., & Byrnes, J. P. (2001). To achieve or not to achieve: A self-regulation perspective on adolescents' academic decision making. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(4), 677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.4.677
  20. Mitra, D. (2004). The significance of students: can increasing" student voice" in schools lead to gains in youth development? The Teachers College Record, 106(4), 651-688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00354.x
  21. Montemayor, R. (1982). The relationship between parent-adolescent conflict and the amount of time adolescents spend alone and with parents and peers.Child Development, 1512-1519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1130078
  22. Schvaneveldt, J. D., & Adams, G. R. (2001). Adolescents and the decision‐making process. Theory Into Practice, 22(2), 98-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405848309543046
  23. Spear, H. J., & Kulbok, P. (2004). Autonomy and adolescence: A concept analysis. Public Health Nursing, 21(2), 144-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-1209.2004.021208.x
  24. Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 2(1), 55-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.2.1.55
  25. Thompson, R. (2006). Cognitive Autonomy in Adolescence.
  26. Turcotte, M. L. (2006). High School Climate: Perceived Safety and Belonging of Students, Faculty, and Parents (Doctoral dissertation, Antioch University New England).
  27. Yeh, K. H., Liu, Y. L., Huang, H. S., & Yang, Y. J. (2007). Individuating and relating autonomy in culturally Chinese adolescents. Casting the individual in societal and cultural contexts, 123-146.
  28. Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Collins, W. A. (2003). Autonomy development during adolescence.
  29. Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational psychologist, 25(1), 3-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2